A great Logico-Linguistic Inquiry To the Fundamentals away from Physics: Region I

Still, they remains accessible to the reader refers to that it works, which is the substance from condition

Medical investigation, experiment measures, abilities and you can perceptions are conceived on head, in addition to creative imagination and phrase and you will build programming. The best revealing out-of abilities is even vital. Especially in theoretic physics, linguistic skills and you can carefulness while creating are becoming a more clicking you would like inside the brand new subjects at the limits away from present training. You can find people from most other areas who will be willing to get me wrong and spark way too many discourses/conclusions; it produce courses regarding several bytes of data instance “yes/no/maybe”; therefore, nonscience or occult misinformation is provided, examples of and therefore abound on the industries off unique relativity concept and you may quantum physics. For this reason, research must not make use of the phrases you to definitely supported the brand new Paleolithic brain. Category: General Research and you may Opinions

Trappist-step one Celebrity Program

The newest James Webb Area Telescope (JWST) will soon transcend just what Hubble has been in a position to mention. One of their very first needs will be the newest TRAPPIST-step one celebrity system within the Aquarius. It article examines why one to puny reddish dwarf is indeed fascinating, and exactly why the hunt for alien existence models elizabeth. Category: General Technology and you will Opinions

Physical dimensions like “mass”, “length”, “charge”, represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like “$m\to 0$”, “$r\to 0$”, “$q\to 0$”, used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because “$ m$”, “$r$”, “$q$” represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and “$0$” represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement “$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge” in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where “physico-mathematical” signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of “self inquiry”, “middle way”, “dependent origination”, “emptiness/relational existence”, which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of “definition”; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of “zero quantity” and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated “limiting process” of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i datingranking.net/introvert-dating.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy